BrahMos WORLD INDIA MADHYA PRADESH BHOPAL WTN SPECIAL GOSSIP CORNER RELIGION SPORTS BUSINESS FUN FACTS ENTERTAINMENT LIFESTYLE TRAVEL ART & LITERATURE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY HEALTH EDUCATION DIASPORA OPINION & INTERVIEW RECIPES DRINKS BIG MEMSAAB 2017 BUDGET 2017 FUNNY VIDEOS VIRAL ON WEB PICTURE STORIES Mahakal Ke Darshan
WTN HINDI ABOUT US PRIVACY POLICY SITEMAP CONTACT US
N
W
T
logo
Breaking News

Homeopathy Vs Modern Science: Cure under questions

Friday - July 6, 2018 3:05 pm , Category : WTN SPECIAL


July 5 (WTN) For more than two centuries, homoeopathy has been believed to be one of the best alternative medicine systems to the allopathic model. Millions of people across generations in over 85 countries have been purportedly benefitted by the use of homeopathic medicines. This form of medicine was founded by German doctor Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843) around 1795 and from then on, it had an undisputed reign over people’s psyche. Homeopathy works on the premise that health is restored by administering highly diluted amounts of substances such as arsenic, belladonna, sepia, nutmeg or chamomile.

But modern science doubts that such highly diluted compositions can have any pharmaceutical benefit on a patient. In most cases, the final medicinal preparation doesn’t even contain a molecule of the original mineral. In adding weight and giving currency to the skepticism, 2009-Nobel laureate scientist Venkatraman Ramakrishnan had a big role, who told an audience in Punjab University, Chandigarh some years back that homeopathy was a bogus science and no one in chemistry believed in homeopathy, which, he said only worked or seemed to work because of the placebo effect.

Several recent studies conducted in different parts of the world by independent scientific bodies like the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; the United Kingdom's House of Commons Science and Technology Committee; the European Academies' Science Advisory Council; and the Swiss Federal Health Office, have corroborated this.

It has been asserted by all of them that homeopathy is a pseudo-science which doesn’t cure anything but only provides placebo effect, which people think and internalise as effective treatment. The National Health Service in England has even announced a policy of not funding homeopathic medicine. So much so that they have called on the UK Department of Health to add homeopathic remedies to the blacklist of forbidden prescription items. But in places and among people where homeopathy has been extant for years and attached to people’s sentiments, it is hard to negate its effectiveness. In India it is a dicey topic as the war between the affiliates and propagators of allopathic medicine and those advocating homeopathy is ever raging.

 There is a huge section of the population which would aver with evidence that homeopathy has cured them, while there will be an equally large section which would downplay and ridicule its effectiveness. India is one of the largest homeopathy markets in the world. The industry is pegged at Rs 1,500 -1,600 crore. Surprisingly, it is growing at a whopping 20 per cent every year.

There are close to three lakh registered practitioners apart from the amateur and unregistered ones, while several thousands are being churned out by the 195-odd homeopathy colleges and 51 homeopathic universities. Homeopathy happens to be the second most popular system of medicine in the country after allopathy. No less than 10-12 per cent of people solely depend on homeopathy, apart from a large chunk which believe in both homeopathy and allopathy. The critics of allopath and beneficiaries of homeopathy vehemently argue in favour of this branch of medicine as the one which is soothing, without the side-effects of allopathic medicines and accurately curing.

 Now coming to the placebo effect, several studies say that placebo has a big role to play in allopathic treatment too. A study even established that the placebo effect in homeopathy was no more than what it was in allopath. The allopathic industry says that the kind of approach of a homeopathic doctor, the attention and softness that is usually seen in them, apart from the keen recording of a patient’s past history etc create a mental state of goodness in the patient that ameliorates his maladies to a great extent. Interestingly, the homeopathic industry lays down many of the same reasons for allopathic medicines too. The hospital ambience, the high-end treatment facilities, the money involved etc, they say, have a big role to play in infusing positivity and energy in a patient, which act beneficially on his health, helping quick healing.  Surprisingly, there is some truth in their claim too.
 
 In a paper titled “The Powerful Placebo’ published in the Journal of American Medical Association in 1955, Boston doctor, Dr Henry Beecher concluded after his studies that even dummy medicines had some medical effects. He postulated that up to 35 per cent of patients felt better when they were told that they were being given some effective and proven medicine even though they were actually given just dummy medicines. The study holds true for all kinds of medicines, whether allopathic or homeopathic. Nevertheless, homeopaths don’t have any conclusive proof to support the actual medicinal value of their alternative way. It is more a general perception and people’s feedback that largely serves the cause of homeopathy. If individuals are talked to, there will be many who would reveal in detail the way they were helped by homeopathy to come out of irrevocable medical conditions.

That may or may not be direct result of homeopathic medicine and may have healed on its own or by the placebo effect but the belief and trust people have in homeopathy cannot be dispelled easily by science through its clinical trials. In any case, practical world experiences differ from the results of clinical trials and the role of variable parameters has to be admitted. Like homeopathy in many cases, many allopathic medicines also target the symptoms rather than the actual disease and it is by rooting out of the symptoms that the disease also gets cured. Yet, in the end, science will have to win. The odds are stacked against homeopathy. It may not be mere sugar balls that are given in the name of medicine, but may also not be much more than that either. The cures homeopathy brings might just be chance occurrences or lucky escapes. Unless there is a strong scientific basis or a finding tested, re-tested and accepted across the spectrum on the basis of evidence that gives the same results every time, reason cannot give much leeway to homeopathy.

It will always be out of the scientific realm, unless proved otherwise through some future breakthrough in research. But for millions of believers across the world, despite the heartbreaks caused by the scientific revelations, homeopathy will still remain the best antidote to all their ills and afflictions.


 
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
*
* - Required fields