SC dismisses plea against Malayalam novel Meesha (Second Lead)
Wednesday - September 5, 2018 7:18 pm ,
Category : ART & LITERATURE
SC dismisses plea against Malayalam novel Meesha (Second Lead)
New Delhi Sep 5 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea seeking a ban on a part of Malayalam novel Meesha saying subjective perception about the book cannot be allowed to come into the legal arena for censorship to stifle the creative imagination of a writer.
Dismissing the petition a bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud in their judgment said: "To apply the litmus test it is to be borne in mind that a book should not be read in a fragmented manner. It had to be read as a whole."
The petitioner N. Radhakrishnan had sought a ban on a part of the novel which he contended had portrayed women and temple priests in an "objectionable" manner.
The court said that language ideas style the manner of portrayal of a character and other aspects of the book had to be appreciated from an objective point of view.
Speaking for the bench Chief Justice Misra said: "There may be subjective perception of a book as regards its worth and evaluation but the said subjectivity cannot be allowed to enter the legal arena for censorship or a ban."
The CJI further said "It has to be kept in mind that the imagination of a writer has to enjoy freedom. It cannot be asked to succumb to specifics. That will tantamount to imposition."
Asserting that a writer "should have free play with words like a painter has it with colours" the court said: "The passion of imagination cannot be directed."
--IANS pk/prs
Dismissing the petition a bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud in their judgment said: "To apply the litmus test it is to be borne in mind that a book should not be read in a fragmented manner. It had to be read as a whole."
The petitioner N. Radhakrishnan had sought a ban on a part of the novel which he contended had portrayed women and temple priests in an "objectionable" manner.
The court said that language ideas style the manner of portrayal of a character and other aspects of the book had to be appreciated from an objective point of view.
Speaking for the bench Chief Justice Misra said: "There may be subjective perception of a book as regards its worth and evaluation but the said subjectivity cannot be allowed to enter the legal arena for censorship or a ban."
The CJI further said "It has to be kept in mind that the imagination of a writer has to enjoy freedom. It cannot be asked to succumb to specifics. That will tantamount to imposition."
Asserting that a writer "should have free play with words like a painter has it with colours" the court said: "The passion of imagination cannot be directed."
--IANS pk/prs
