Know the sections 33 (2), 47 and 57 of the Aadhaar act
Wednesday - September 26, 2018 2:55 pm ,
Category : WTN SPECIAL
Now Aadhaar card is constitutional: Supreme Court
Supreme Court declares section 57 of the Aadhaar act illegal, now private companies will not be able to demand for the Aadhaar card mandatory
SEP 26 (WTN) – There is a discussion everywhere after the decision on the Aadhaar card by the Supreme Court. The five-member bench of the Supreme Court has recognized 3-2 as the Aadhaar is constitutional. The Supreme Court has said in its decision that some information recorded on the Aadhar affects one’s privacy, but in broad terms, the Aadhaar card is very amazing in a very significant sense.
Supreme Court has abolished the mandatory of Aadhaar card in linking mobile number and bank account, many facilities including admission in school. In its judgment, the Supreme Court has dismissed section 33 (2), section 47 and section 57 related to the Aadhaar act and declared them illegal. The Congress has also targeted the Modi government after rejecting these three sections. Let's know what these three sections are.
Section 33 (2)
In section 33 (2) of Aadhaar act, there was provision that information related to any person’s Aadhaar card can be disclosed. But there was a system in it that the officer below from the Joint Secretary level on behalf of the Central Government can’t get any information about any person through the Aadhaar card, but now that section has been dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Section-47
In the historic judgment, the Supreme Court has termed section-47 of the Aadhaar act as illegal. Under this act, for the data breech, only UIDAI could only file the FIR for criminal proceedings. In this case no person was allowed to register a criminal case. But now any person, if he thinks that his data is being misused, he can file a criminal case.
Section 57
Under Section 57, the information of the Aadgaar was permitted to verify the identity of a person. But after the Supreme Court decision, it has now become illegal. That is, any private company can’t necessarily demand Aadhaar card. For your information let you know that till now private companies used to demand the Aadhaar card before giving any kind of service, which will no longer be able to demand. In its decision, the judges said that all the arrangements already exist for verification of a person. In such a way, you can’t interfere in the privacy of the people through such a section.
SEP 26 (WTN) – There is a discussion everywhere after the decision on the Aadhaar card by the Supreme Court. The five-member bench of the Supreme Court has recognized 3-2 as the Aadhaar is constitutional. The Supreme Court has said in its decision that some information recorded on the Aadhar affects one’s privacy, but in broad terms, the Aadhaar card is very amazing in a very significant sense.
Supreme Court has abolished the mandatory of Aadhaar card in linking mobile number and bank account, many facilities including admission in school. In its judgment, the Supreme Court has dismissed section 33 (2), section 47 and section 57 related to the Aadhaar act and declared them illegal. The Congress has also targeted the Modi government after rejecting these three sections. Let's know what these three sections are.
Section 33 (2)
In section 33 (2) of Aadhaar act, there was provision that information related to any person’s Aadhaar card can be disclosed. But there was a system in it that the officer below from the Joint Secretary level on behalf of the Central Government can’t get any information about any person through the Aadhaar card, but now that section has been dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Section-47
In the historic judgment, the Supreme Court has termed section-47 of the Aadhaar act as illegal. Under this act, for the data breech, only UIDAI could only file the FIR for criminal proceedings. In this case no person was allowed to register a criminal case. But now any person, if he thinks that his data is being misused, he can file a criminal case.
Section 57
Under Section 57, the information of the Aadgaar was permitted to verify the identity of a person. But after the Supreme Court decision, it has now become illegal. That is, any private company can’t necessarily demand Aadhaar card. For your information let you know that till now private companies used to demand the Aadhaar card before giving any kind of service, which will no longer be able to demand. In its decision, the judges said that all the arrangements already exist for verification of a person. In such a way, you can’t interfere in the privacy of the people through such a section.
