BrahMos WORLD INDIA MADHYA PRADESH BHOPAL WTN SPECIAL GOSSIP CORNER RELIGION SPORTS BUSINESS FUN FACTS ENTERTAINMENT LIFESTYLE TRAVEL ART & LITERATURE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY HEALTH EDUCATION DIASPORA OPINION & INTERVIEW RECIPES DRINKS BIG MEMSAAB 2017 BUDGET 2017 FUNNY VIDEOS VIRAL ON WEB PICTURE STORIES Mahakal Ke Darshan
WTN HINDI ABOUT US PRIVACY POLICY SITEMAP CONTACT US
logo
Breaking News

Priyanka s clarification raises more questions: Minister

Friday - April 28, 2017 9:36 pm , Category : INDIA
 Priyanka s clarification raises more questions: Minister
Priyanka s clarification raises more questions: Minister

New Delhi April 28 (IANS) Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Friday said that a public clarification issued by Congress President s daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra about her land deals raises more questions than it answers.

He said there is a similar pattern in the land deals of Priyanka and her husband Robert Vadra.

Only one inference can be drawn from Priyanka s statement -- perhaps she was advised this is too hot a potato to be handled and therefore her transactions must be segregated and a clarification issued Prasad said while speaking with TimesNow channel.

... her clarification raises more questions than it answers he added.

Priyanka said on Thursday that agricultural land bought by her in Haryana s Faridabad district or other property acquired by her had no links to the finances of her husband his Skylight Hospitality or reality major DLF.

A report in the Economic Times on Thursday said the S.N. Dhingra Commission appointed by the Haryana government is said to have concluded that Vadra made unlawful profits of Rs 50.5 crore from a land deal in Haryana in 2008 without spending a single paisa.

Prasad said certain patterns are similar in the land deals of both Priyanka and Robert Vadra.

One the land is transferred back to the vendor in both cases; and secondly the appreciation of the land is enormous.

Given the influence Robert Vadra exercised with the then (Bhupinder Singh Hooda) government and the speedy manner in which land use was changed after bypassing norms it can be inferred that it was designed to allow a situation of windfall gains Prasad said.

On te Congress objection that no notice was sent by the commission to either Robert Vadra or Hooda Prasad said Justice S.N. Dhingra (retd) must have followed the procedure.

Justice Dhingra is a seasoned and celebrated judge. His knowledge of law is wholesome. Let s assume he sent notices but they were not answered. The larger issue is: don t go into procedure but come to propriety. Don t go into semantics but reply on substance Prasad a senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader said.

--IANS
mak/tsb/vt